New paper on why game theory falls down in the real world of complicated games, like financial markets:

Complex dynamics in learning complicated gamesTobias Galla, J. Doyne Farmer

Game theory is the standard tool used to model strategic interactions in evolutionary biology and social science. Traditional game theory studies the equilibria of simple games. But is traditional game theory applicable if the game is complicated, and if not, what is? We investigate this question here, defining a complicated game as one with many possible moves, and therefore many possible payoffs conditional on those moves. We investigate two-person games in which the players learn based on experience. By generating games at random we show that under some circumstances the strategies of the two players converge to fixed points, but under others they follow limit cycles or chaotic attractors. The dimension of the chaotic attractors can be very high, implying that the dynamics of the strategies are effectively random.

In the chaotic regime the payoffs fluctuate intermittently, showing bursts of rapid change punctuated by periods of quiescence, similar to what is observed in fluid turbulence and financial markets. Our results suggest that such intermittency is a highly generic phenomenon, and thatthere is a large parameter regime for which complicated strategic interactions generate inherently unpredictable behavior that is best described in the language of dynamical systems theory.

via [1109.4250] Complex dynamics in learning complicated games.

Could the fact that every so often (say 10/15 years or so) the mix between experienced market participants to novices (defined as someone who has only experienced few events) weighs in favour of the novices. Consequently, eventhough macro events differ in details to those of the past, the emotional response repeat themselves over time (call them cycles?) as novices become more experienced. In other words, every so often there is a reset of the parameters and the 'game' starts from scratch again.

Wonder if what i'm saying applies at all!?

Interesting perspective, and one that coincides with some longerwriting that I've been working on. I think many things can becomplained by this periodicity introduced by our short time horizons,and made worse by lottery effects in relevant markets.