Interesting indeed. A side observation to the graphic, the six lowest cost locations are also the six most likely places that you'll have a driver driving your car. I'm not sure what the correlation is between having a driver and low parking rates, but I'm sure someone with free time on their hands could find a connection.
It's a chart, but it's not much of a chart. I have no idea what the y axis is, do you? I assume that it's adjusted for some sort of local cost of living measure. Also, what's with the colors?
Interesting indeed. A side observation to the graphic, the six lowest cost locations are also the six most likely places that you'll have a driver driving your car. I'm not sure what the correlation is between having a driver and low parking rates, but I'm sure someone with free time on their hands could find a connection.
It's a chart, but it's not much of a chart. I have no idea what the y axis is, do you? I assume that it's adjusted for some sort of local cost of living measure. Also, what's with the colors?
What happened to Monte-Carlo?
It's so small there's no parking…
Strangely, they've skipped over some of the cities, like Calgary, at spot 21. Not sure which city was supposed to be in spot 10?
Here we go, Oslo was 10: http://www.colliers.com/Country/UnitedStates/cont…
Wonder if there's a correlation to public transportation efficiency…