The Gold Standard and the Cost of Capital

Interesting new paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago on the gold standard and the cost of capital. Did adhering to the gold standard reduce firms’ cost of capital during the pre- WWI period? In a word, No.

Read on:

Did Adhering to the Gold Standard Reduce the Cost of Capital?

Ron Alquist, Ben Chabot

A commonly cited benefit of the pre?World War One gold standard is that it reduced the cost of international borrowing by signaling a country’s commitment to financial probity. Using a newly constructed data set that consists of more than 55,000 monthly sovereign bond returns, we test if gold?standard adherence was negatively correlated with the cost of capital. Conditional on UK risk factors, we find no evidence that the bonds issued by countries off gold earned systematically higher excess returns than the bonds issued by countries on gold. Our results are robust to allowing betas to differ across bonds issued by countries off? and on?gold; to including proxies that capture the effect of fiscal, monetary, and trade shocks on the commitment to gold; and to controlling for the effect of membership in the British Empire.

For the skeptics, note that the paper does a defensible job of controlling for most confounding variables, like trade, fiscal, monetary policy, etc.

Related posts:

  1. Euro as the New Depression-era Gold Standard
  2. Fetters of Gold and Paper: How Fixed Exchange Rates Can Kill You
  3. Monetary Police is Science, Everything Else is Stamp-Collecting
  4. The Case for Pricing Gold in Gold
  5. The Cost of Starting Up