Monetary Police is Science, Everything Else is Stamp-Collecting

This new Eric Leeper paper seems delusional in arguing that monetary policy is science, while fiscal policy is stamp-collecting, but I maybe I’m just being crotchety. The piece also comes up with the new-to-me argument that monetary policy would be even better science if it weren’t for fiscal policy mucking things up.

Monetary Science, Fiscal Alchemy

Eric M. Leeper

NBER Working Paper No. 16510
Issued in October 2010

Monetary policy decisions tend to be based on systematic analysis of alternative policy choices and their associated macroeconomic impacts: this is science. Fiscal policy choices, in contrast, spring from unsystematic speculation, grounded more in politics than economics: this is alchemy. In normal times, fiscal alchemy poses no insurmountable problems for monetary policy because fiscal expectations can be extrapolated from past fiscal behavior. But normal times may be coming to an end: aging populations are causing promised government old-age benefits to grow relentlessly and many governments have no plans for financing the benefits. In this era of fiscal stress, fiscal expectations are unanchored and fiscal alchemy creates unnecessary uncertainty and can undermine the ability of monetary policy to control inflation and influence real economic activity in the usual ways.

Related posts:

  1. How We Came to Love (the Same) Monetary Policy
  2. Emerging Markets, and the Global Monetary Merry-go-Round
  3. Non-Monetary Utility and the WSOP Bubble
  4. How is Japan Relevant to U.S.?
  5. China Leaps to Second Spot in Global Science