Protectionism and the Chinese Box of the Renminbi
I have a commentary piece on Marketplace this coming week arguing that the U.S. dollar must be allowed by Asian central banks to depreciate against more currencies than the Euro. All of the longstanding trade and flow imbalances cannot be funneled through a single currency pair without creating even more grotesque trade & debt distortions.
And, as Michael Pettis points out, if the exchange shift cannot be made to happen to escape the Chinese box of a renminbi loose peg, the imbalances will end up in political hands with worrying protectionist implications:
In that sense the refusal of Asian central banks to permit the needed appreciation of their currencies against the dollar may end up having the same impact on the adjustment process of the overvalued currencies. The 1930s seemed to show, according to the authors, that when their currencies could not adjust, countries became protectionist. So if the overvalued dollar cannot adjust except against the euro, and if the already overvalued euro has to bear the brunt of any further adjustment, will American and European politicians be forced into the “second-best” option of trade protection? No prizes for guessing what I think.
More here.