Countering the Anti-Peak Oil Sorts

Good piece by Matt Simmons in the current Foreign Policy attacking the current spate of pieces authored by peak oil foes:

In my view, while Yergin, Lynch, Morse, and Jaffe, are articulate in their theories, none seem to have any strong sense of the brutally grim reality of today’s oil markets. The facts speak for themselves: Oil flows have peaked, technology is now mature, the people running the industry are far too old, and few top-notch graduates are interested in embarking on a career in such a volatile field.

Even oil’s much-touted 150th anniversary is a myth. You can read about an oil flame burning next to Babylon in the Old Testament. This was oil flaring from Kirkuk, which later became the first super-giant oilfield found in the Middle East in the late 1920s.

Oil has been a miracle resource for ages but has never been well understood. For more than a century, myths about oil kept the real facts buried in a fog of bad information. Until the world’s oil producers allow third-party audits of the flow rates of the world’s largest oil fields, which they have so far been reluctant to do, it is impossible to know just how dire a situation we are in. I believe that such an audit would prove peak oil, but it is certainly irresponsible to make optimistic projections without hard data.

More here.

Related posts:

  1. The China Anti-Bubble in VC Investing
  2. Patent Pools are Bad For You: Tragedy of the Anti-Anti-Commons
  3. Google is the World’s Most Cost-Effective Brand
  4. Dash.net and Anti-Social Networks
  5. NYT: Misplaced Anti-Bear Snark