« The Shorter Education of Ben Bernanke | Main | Cramer on Banks & Books: Fiction, Fiction, Fiction »
Latest Stories
- Excel Wankers and Recession Averages
- Sorry, New York is Closed. Check Back Later.
- Catching Falling 2009 Earnings Estimate Knife
- Survivorship Bias in Global Markets
- Talking Positions on a Lazy-ish Retirement Portfolio
January 17, 2008
Richard Rhodes on Nuclear Arsenals
Fascinating Richard Rhodes discussion of the growth of nuclear arsenals during the Cold War -- and the remaining risks.
Sphere It
|
Digg it
|
Bookmark it
|
Stumble it
|
Facebook it









Ironic how the U.S.S.R. had enough nukes to basically exterminate all human life on earth, and the U.S. never executed a direct pre-emptive strike -- while today, the very rumor that a "rogue nation" might be 2-5 years from developing a SINGLE nuke is cause for invasion and occupation.
A cynic, like me, might declare that -- since the U.S. has never directly attacked a nation that possessed weapons of mass destruction -- it is almost evidentiary that if the U.S. DOES launch a pre-emptive attack, then that victim nation must NOT have a bomb when the attack takes place. After all, U.S. "negotiates" with nuclear rogue states ...