Steve Jobs is Bad Man, Says ex-Apple CFO

Despite having been absolved of all blame by Apple’s board for option backdating, Apple CEO Steve Jobs just got blamed for same by the company’s former CFO, Fred Anderson.

Here are the money quotes from an Anderson press release, with the kicker (underlined) at the beginning:

  • Fred was told by Steve Jobs in late January 2001 that Mr. Jobs had the agreement of the Board of Directors for the Executive Team grant on January 2, 2001. At the time Mr. Jobs provided Fred this assurance, Fred cautioned Mr. Jobs that the Executive Team grant would have to be priced based on the date of the actual Board agreement or there could be an accounting charge. He further advised Mr. Jobs that the Board would have to confirm its prior approval in a legally satisfactory method. He was told by Mr. Jobs that the Board had given its prior approval and the Board would verify it. Fred relied on these statements by Mr. Jobs and from them concluded the grant was being properly handled.
  • Fred understood that, under Apple’s stock option plan and accounting rules at the time, a grant date could be moved to a later date than the date of the actual grant decision and that there would be no compensation expense as long as the stock price on the new date was higher than the price on the original date. Apple’s 1998 Executive Officer Stock Option Plan provided in Section 16 that ‘The date of grant of an Option…shall be, for all purposes, the date on which the Administrator (in this case the Board) makes the determination granting such Option…or such later date as is determined by the Administrator ‘. Mr. Anderson understood that the date of grant was to be moved forward pursuant to this provision from January 2 to January 17 to avoid any appearance of impropriety that might arise from a grant awarded just prior to the stock price rise that resulted from the 2001 MacWorld exhibition and Mr. Job’s keynote speech at the exhibition on January 9. He further understood that the January 17 date was selected by Mr. Jobs and Ms. Nancy Heinen, the former General Counsel, and that the stock price on January 17 was higher than the price on January 2.
  • Finally, Mr. Anderson understood that the Board of Directors, which consisted of sophisticated corporate executives of national stature, including the former Chief Financial Officer of IBM, verified the January 17 date by signing in early February 2001 a Unanimous Written Consent (UWC) with an effective date of January 17. It now appears the Board may not have given the necessary prior approval to the grants, contrary to what Mr. Anderson understood from Mr. Jobs and from the Board’s signing of the UWC with an effective date of January 17.

Perhaps needless to say, this is very serious stuff.

[via BW]


  1. Fred is a fall guy at aapl. its seems obvious that jobs was hyper involved in rigging the dates of SO issuance both at aapl and pixar. its a testimony to his elevated status, propped up by fawning media and ws establishment, that he will escape from this unscathed, living to fight another day, to give another macworld presentation on his $1 a year salary. He will arrive by Gulfstream V.

  2. if true, this is some seriously slimey stuff jobs is up to.

  3. caveat: I am a big Apple fan. I am a big Steve Jobs fan. So feel free to call me biased.
    Why was Fred Anderson, CFO and presumably holder of several business degrees, letting Steve Jobs, CEO and college dropout, tell him how to do his job? Fred should have said, “Uh, I don’t care what the other CEOs told you, it doesn’t work that way.”
    Of course, Fred is settling with the SEC and it will probably end there. I don’t think Steve knew what he was doing (he’s never been good with money). It was Fred’s job to stop all this non-sense.

  4. Franklin Stubbs says:

    Sounds more like Jobs was just being his arrogant, pushy, buttheaded self–traits he has long been forgiven for b/c of his genius–and this guy got cowed into not doing his job.
    Anderson sounds like a lawyer who got disbarred for something an aggressive client made him do. It’s not the client’s job to know the line or respect it, especially when said client is busy taking over the world.