The Future is Farmland

Some fascinating stuff in a Bloomberg article on how corn farms have replaced New York lofts as hot property:

  • Price increase y-o-y of crop land in Idaho/Indiana: 35%/16%
  • Price increase y-o-y of Manhattan lofts: 12%
  • U.S. farmland area decrease 1981-2001: 9.6-million acres

It’s partly about surging demand for agricultural products, but also about scarcity, as the above figure shows.

Related posts:

  1. Fun at the U.S. PTO
  2. The Future of the Future of Spam (& Email)
  3. What Would You Tell the Future?
  4. Sequoia’s Google Gains
  5. The Future is Corn

Comments

  1. Marc Faber is on a rant about Farmland and I think he is right.

  2. So is Jim Rogers, and I think they’re both right. It’s great, timely and investable thesis.

  3. Tomas Sancio says:

    The risk to these corn farm investments is the USA lowering the import tariffs to Brazilian ethanol (made from more-efficient sugarcane).

  4. Buy farmland in countries with stable property rights that stand to benefit from growing domestic populations and falling tariffs. Chile would have been ideal 10 years ago.

  5. rw2 says:

    With all due respect to Mr. Sancio above, there is almost no risk of a farm bubble due to brazil. Even if brazil switched entirely to sugarcane they wouldn’t be able to come close to satisfying the ravenous US fuel needs. And, if they did so, then they would be taking millions of acres of soy beans out of production. US farms are, to a first approximation, in a bean/corn rotation. Currently beans aren’t as profitable as corn, so more corn is grown. If beans became more profitable (if, for example, brazil took bean acres out and the market still wanted a bunch of beans) then the US would grow more beans.