« Peter Bernstein on Amaranth: Better to be Wrong Than Too Right | Main | Has Yahoo Been Behind the Door When Ads Handed Out? »
Latest Stories
- Bubbles are Good For You Because ... They Are
- Quote of the Day: Commodities Markets
- San Diego Homes Bottoming?
- The Myth of the Angel Investor
- Pete Peterson on Subprime, Bailouts, etc.
September 25, 2006
Thanks BusinessWeek, But ...
I'm grateful to BusinessWeek for naming this site one of the best of the web, #2 behind TechCrunch, to be precise It's always nice to be recognized.That said, I'm a little puzzled at something: Why do none of the sites in the list actually link to the site in question? I have to confess I find the absence of hyperlinks ... unusual.
Sphere It
| 
Digg it
| 
Bookmark it
| 
Stumble it
I read the Business Week article and I'm checking out your site. - Ron
... and then you don't link to TechCrunch. Not like Mike needs the traffic...
Thanks to Business Week, I found your interesting blog site. I am based in Jakarta, Java, Indonesia and have the main interest in developing venture capital business in the country.
Cheers,
Jakarta, Tuesday 26th September 2006
Avi -- Mike's bigger than I am, but my traffic is so highly targeted, of course.
Paul,
Gongrats for being on the list!
On the funny side, I think, this is BusinessWeek's way of a skill testing question! Remember those required skill testing questions in Canadian lotteries? e.g. What is 35 + 7 = ?
Or may be BW is a partner of Google and want to make sure those that are not smart enough to Google paid by price of not visiting those sites!
On a serious note, by not linking to these 10 sites, I am betting/guessing at least 30% (may be even 40%) of the people won't bother to Google and check out these sites. What a shame.
Kempton