Steve Jobs Journalism and the TTM Factor

In reading Michael Wolff’s over-wrought Vanity Fair column on Apple guy Steve Jobs it reminded me of my TTM measure for all Jobs journalism. TTM? Time to Mercurial — how long does it take until the writer describes Jobs as “mercurial”?

Wolff is a slow-starter, but he gets there eventually. It takes him eight paragraphs before he uses the “m” word, but he eventually it’s right there:

Over the years there have been reports of his disorder-ish eating
quirks, obsessive perfectionism, bouts of depression. There’s the
mercurialness; the tantrums; the hours-long, dictator-like speeches;
the famous, desperate, and transparent hogging of credit; and always
the charismatic-leader complex (known widely as the Jobs
“reality-distortion field”), through which he has been able to seduce
and, subsequently, abandon so many of the people he’s worked with. He
may be as troubled and unsocialized (and, too, as charismatic) a figure
in American business life as anyone since Howard Hughes.  [Emphasis mine]

Related posts:

  1. Steve Jobs Doesn’t Get Network Effects
  2. Eddie Lampert as the Steve Jobs of Investing
  3. Nanotech, Steve Jobs, and the Trouble with Hard-drives
  4. Ellison on Life, Love, Steve Jobs, Men with Guns, & Romance Novels
  5. New Jobs Book Not Worth Banning


  1. Barry says:

    Your TTM indicator reminds me of the TTB indicator for interviews with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. I’m always waiting for the inevitable mention of the Beatles. The more thoughful articles never get around to the Fab-4.