« Poor, Poor Patent-Happy Me | Main | Fox on Facebook: Not at These Prices »
Latest Stories
- Pete Peterson on Subprime, Bailouts, etc.
- Yahoo's Jerry Yang Needs to Get on With Things
- The Mortgage Bankers Association Mortgage Problem
- Graphical Look at Real House Price Declines
- Alan Greenspan vs. His Critics
March 30, 2006
The Economics of Airports
UCSD economist Richard Carson has an entertaining editorial in a San Diego paper about the errant economics of a new San Diego airport. A highly controversial subject, especially to those of us on the east side of La Jolla over which flights might roar in one new airport scenario, Carson brings some rigor to the rhetoric.As he rightly points out, this is essentially a pricing problem. It's not that San Diego doesn't have an airport, although Lindbergh is admittedly a small, one-runway site, but the bigger issue that it misprices its services such that capacity is over-used by smaller jets, as opposed to bigger commercial carriers.
So, the solution:
The airport authority needs to put a price on Lindbergh's truly scarce resource, the limited number of takeoff and landing slots available in different time periods, if Lindbergh is to run smoothly.Is this a radical new idea that has not been carefully thought through? No, Logan Airport in Boston has been given permission by the FAA and started pricing slots in different time periods to get the desired number of takeoff and landings. Charging for slots is the norm at popular European airports and, as a result, relatively few small planes are used at such airports.
Sphere It
|
Digg it
|
Bookmark it
|
Stumble it
Andy -- Nicely put. The trouble is, "making the best of it" is not a politically-compatible brain pattern. A new airport, like a new stadium, is not economically rational, but it is still a line item in the next election campaign. That's why voters, when given better information about costs and compromises, are most often the deciding factor via referenda.









If you live in a major American city you may wonder why your airport is located where it is. In most cases it is there becuase a 27 year old university drop out with no formal training in urban planning or meteorology decided that that's where it should be located. New technology tends to evolve randomly and then you are stuck with it for decades to come. But as Carson points out, you're probably better off making the best of it rather than starting over from scratch.