Is Web 2.0 a Waste?
A reader made some provocative comments on an earlier post about Web 2.0, so I’ll repost them here:
As much as I love trying the new technology and services, very little has changed in how I use the web. Only RSS aggregation has truly offered me value. Everything else I enjoy trying out and then utterly forget it after a week. Meebo is a great example. Loved the service. Loved using it. Stopped using it a while back and had trouble remembering the name today. Gmail I still use but thread it through Outlook. Google maps and Virtual earth I use but ultimately because they have much bigger maps than mapquest. The satellite imagery I find useless. Checked out goowy last night. Awesome. I will never visit it again. I cannot think of one mashup that I have used beyond that initial curiosity phase.
Not to conflate Web 2.0 with mash-ups, but he makes a good point. Can anyone point to a mash-up that they continue to use after the first “Whoa, cool!” moment? I use Paul Rademacher’s housing maps service now and then (mostly to cringe at the prices of homes here in La Jolla), but as near as I can figure, that’s the only mash-up I use. And as far as technologies go, the only so-called 2.0 technology that has really penetrated my daily work/play life is syndication feeds, which I have waxed about many times.
So, does that means Web 2.0 is a waste, a sexy phrase to suck in venture capitalists? No, not at all, and while I’ll try to frame some comments later today or tomorrow, I’m hesitant to post more detailed thoughts on the subject as I would quickly end up talking my book (as we used to say in the brokerage business).
1