The Open Platforms Paradox

Jeremy Zawodny indirectly makes this interesting point in a post from Web 2.0: If open platforms are so great, why is the adoption of open platforms so poor? An interesting example is instant messaging, where every platform is closed — except for Jabber, which has no adoption.

Sure, some of it has to do with first-mover advantage, but that’s not the whole story. And if it were the whole story it would certainly be a slap for advocates of more open platforms. After all, if the advantage of openness is so meager as to be trumped by something as tenuous as first-mover advantage that doesn’t say much for the implicit value people place in openness.

Related posts:

  1. Do Execs Open Email Attachments?
  2. What We Learned at the New Economy
  3. Reed Elsevier, Open Publishing, and Investment Shorts
  4. Is the end of Netscape the end of open source?
  5. sxip, Flickr, and New Online Plaforms